Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?
CISA’s Memory Safety Report: Half of Critical Open Source Projects at Risk!
The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) analyzed 172 critical open source projects, finding over half use memory-unsafe languages like C and C++. Even projects in memory-safe languages can be vulnerable through dependencies. The report pushes organizations to reduce software vulnerabilities from memory safety bugs.
Hot Take:
Looks like C and C++ are the junk food of programming languages. Tasty and popular, but they’re giving our software a serious case of indigestion. Time to switch to a healthier diet before our cyber arteries clog up for good.
Key Points:
- Over half of 172 critical open source projects analyzed by CISA contain code written in memory-unsafe languages like C and C++.
- Even memory-safe languages can have vulnerabilities through unsafe dependencies.
- Memory-safe languages, like Rust, Go, and Python, manage memory for developers, reducing errors.
- The report aligns with efforts by Five Eyes nations to minimize software vulnerabilities.
- Projects like Linux, Chromium, and Gecko predominantly use memory-unsafe languages.
Already a member? Log in here