Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?
Cybersecurity Conundrum: Navigating the Labyrinth of Biden’s ‘Performance-Based’ Regulations
Welcome to the choose-your-own-adventure of cybersecurity, courtesy of the National Cybersecurity Strategy Regulations. A game of interpretive patching, tailored rules, or performance-based confusion. So buckle up, it’s time to dive into the murky, ever-evolving waters of cybersecurity regulation. It’s like dieting, but with more at…
Hot Take:
The Biden Administration's new National Cybersecurity Strategy comes with a whole new set of rules. But it's like being handed a choose-your-own-adventure book with no right answer. You can patch that software flaw "in a timely manner," or you could have it done in 15 days flat. But what constitutes "timely?" And does every company have the resources to pull off a patch within two weeks? No one's really sure. What we do know is that this strategy is pushing for new regulations that are "performance-based" and custom-tailored for each critical-infrastructure sector. But let's be honest, we're all still trying to figure out what makes a regulation performance-based and if that's actually the best approach. Let's dive into the murky waters of cybersecurity regulations, shall we?Already a member? Log in here