Okay, deep breath, let's get this over with. In the grand act of digital self-sabotage, we've littered this site with cookies. Yep, we did that. Why? So your highness can have a 'premium' experience or whatever. These traitorous cookies hide in your browser, eagerly waiting to welcome you back like a guilty dog that's just chewed your favorite shoe. And, if that's not enough, they also tattle on which parts of our sad little corner of the web you obsess over. Feels dirty, doesn't it?
Supreme Court Sidesteps Social Media Censorship Fray: States Lack Standing in First Amendment Showdown
In a digital drama twist, the Supreme Court said “no standing, no ruling” on the social media censorship scuffle. Sorry states, your “tall order” lacked the legal legs to stand on! #SupremeCourtSocialMediaSaga
Hot Take:
Who knew "standing" could be such a buzzkill? Just when you thought the courtroom was about to turn into a First Amendment Thunderdome, the Supreme Court basically said, "You can't sit with us!" to Missouri and Louisiana. Sorry, states, looks like you'll need more than a hunch and a grudge to play in the big leagues of legal battles. And for social media, it's back to the daily grind of tag, you're retweeted!
Already a member? Log in here